Analisis Makna Kewajiban Rehabilitasi Medis Terhadap Pecandu Narkotika
Abstract
The application of sanctions on narcotics is quite serious, but in fact the perpetrators of crimes are increasing, and for convicts in practice it is inconclusive and prone to recidivism. This can be caused because the criminal conviction by the judge has no impact or is slow on the culprit. So far, judges tend to emphasize more on criminal sanctions, if it is worth the behavior of the perpetrator with the aim that the perpetrator does not repeat his behavior. This can be caused by the existence of a criminal conviction factor by a judge that does not have an impact or deferrent effect on the perpetrators. So far, criminal convictions by judges tend to prioritize criminal sanctions that are worth the perpetrator's actions, with the aim that the perpetrator does not repeat his actions. In general, drug addicts and victims of narcotics crimes have not received access to rehabilitation services, especially drug addicts and victims of narcotics crimes who are in prisons and detention centers. Therefore, the emphasis of the formulation in this study is how to analyze the significance of medical rehabilitation obligations for drug addicts. The methods used in this study are normative methods and approaches to the method of the statutory approach (Statue Approach) and Conceptual Approach (Conceptual Approach) The results of the study found that Makana Medical Rehabilitation Obligations Against Narcotic Addicts are "sick people" who are obliged to undergo treatment by placing them in medical rehabilitation and or social rehabilitation institutions. As a recommendation, the researcher is to the Government and the House of Representatives to add an explanation of narcotics addicts in Article 54 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, by including the amount of medical rehabilitation financing provided to drug addicts in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Prior to the promulgation of the amount of medical rehabilitation financing, the provision of medical rehabilitation for drug addicts would be easier to implement, and to the community to increase participation in the prevention of narcotics addicts and the accessibility to the settlement of cases in litigation and non-litigation.
Downloads
References
Afrizal, Riki, and Upita Anggunsuri, ‘Optimalisasi Proses Asesmen Terhadap Penyalah Guna Narkotika Dalam Rangka Efektivitas Rehabilitasi Medis Dan Sosial Bagi Pecandu Narkotika’, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19.3 (2019), 259 <https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.259-268>
Anggrayni L, ‘Efektivitas Rehabilitasi Pecandu Narkotika ( Studi Di Loka Rehabilitasi Badan Narkotika Nasional Batam )’, Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 18.1 (2018), 78–96
Arianto, Satriyo Bagus, ‘Kewenangan BNN Dalam Pemberian Rehabilitasi Pada Pecandu Narkotika’, Jurist-Diction, 4.5 (2021), 2037 <https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i5.29832>
Athallah, Akwila Arif, and Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba, ‘PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PECANDU NARKOTIKA DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI ASPEK TUJUAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM’, Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2020, 17 <https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v0i0.195>
Dharma Susila, Gst Ngurah Arya, and Ida Bagus Surya Dharma Jaya, ‘PENGATURAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PECANDU DAN PENYALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA’, Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8.10 (2020), 1504 <https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i10.p02>
Hasbih, Hasbih, ‘PENERAPAN REHABILITASI TERHADAP PECANDU DAN KORBAN PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN” (STUDI KASUS DI WILAYAH HUKUM KABUPATEN MAJALENGKA)’, Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 2020, 444–62 <https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v0i0.6321>
Huda, Nurul, Yusuf Saefuddin, Seno Wibowo Gumira, and Sumarji Sumarji, ‘Asesmen Terpadu: Penerapan Restorative Justice Penanggulangan Kejahatan Narkotika Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14.1 (2020), 111 <https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.111-124>
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI), ‘REHABILITASI’ <https://kbbi.web.id/rehabilitasi>
Karina, Renny Gladis, ‘PEMINADAAN TERHADAP PENGEDAR SEKALIGUS PECANDU NARKOTIKA DALAM PERSPEKTIF TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN’, Badamai Law Journal, 4.2 (2020), 354 <https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v4i2.9247>
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005)
Maysarah, M, ‘Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika’, SOSEK: Jurnal Sosial Dan Ekonomi, 1.1 (2020), 53 <http://www.jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/sosek/article/view/54>
Muslimah, Muslimah, ‘Terapi Mandi Terhadap Pecandu Narkotika Di Pondok Pesantren Al-Qodir Cangkringan Sleman Yogyakarta’, Coution : Journal of Counseling and Education, 1.2 (2020), 1 <https://doi.org/10.47453/coution.v1i2.114>
Nafisah, Diani Utami, Mohammad Benny Alexandri, and R. Ira Irawati, ‘EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN PENANGANAN PECANDU NARKOTIKA OLEH BADAN NARKOTIKA NASIONAL PROVINSI JAWA BARAT’, Responsive, 1.3 (2019), 103 <https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v1i3.20746>
Putra, Zelni, ‘Upaya Rehabilitasi Bagi Penyalahguna Narkotika Oleh BNNK Padang’ (Universitas Andalas Padang, 2011) <http://repo.unand.ac.id/2468/>
Supramono, Gatot, Hukum Narkoba Indonesia (Jakarta: Djambatan, 2001)
Syamsuddin, Aziz, Tindak Pidana Khusus (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011) <978-979-007 387 6>
valentina sinaga, Maria, and Suriani, ‘Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Terhadap Pecandu Dan Korban Penyalagunaan Narkotika (Studi Bnn Kab. Asahan)’, Jurnal Pionir LPPM Universitas Asahan, 6.1 (2020), 132–38 <http://www.jurnal.una.ac.id/index.php/pionir/article/view/1069>
Authors who publish with Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
