Sistematik review: Hubungan Big Five Personality Model dengan motivasi siswa di sekolah

  • Mamang Efendy Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Jl. Semolowaru No.45 Surabaya
Keywords: motivasi, Big Five Personality Model

Abstract

Motivation is a process that explains one's strength, direction and perseverance in an effort to achieve his goals. Motivation varies from one individual to another. In motivational studies there are individual differences, individual differences in way of thinking, way of feeling, in what is desired and what is needed, as well as individual differences in what is done. The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship of Big Five Personality Model with student motivation in school, be it learning motivation, academic motivation and achievement motivation. The results of a literature study from 10 research journals showed that personality awareness or Conscientiousness was shown to have a significant influence on motivation, be it performance motivation, learning motivation and motivation of achievement, personality Conscientiousness, Extraversion and Openness associated positively and significantly with motivation, while for personality Neuroticism some studies found to have weak correlations and even negative correlations with motivas i, but other studies have found a strong and positive correlation with motivation.

Motivasi merupakan proses yang menjelaskan mengenai kekuatan, arah dan ketekunan seseorang dalam upaya mencapai tujuannya. Motivasi bervariasi dari satu individu ke yang lain. Dalam kajian motivasi terdapat perbedaan individu, perbedaan individu dalam cara berpikir, cara merasa, dalam apa yang diinginkan dan apa yang dibutuhkan, serta perbedaan individu dalam apa yang dilakukan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan Big Five Personality Model dengan motivasi siswa disekolah, baik itu motivasi belajar, motivasi akademik dan motivasi berprestasi. Hasil studi literatur dari 10 jurnal penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepribadian kesadaran atau Conscientiousness terbukti memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap motivasi, baik itu motivasi kinerja, motivasi belajar dan motivasi berprestasi, kepribadian Conscientiousness, Extraversion dan keterbukaan berhubungan positif dan signifikan dengan motivasi, sedangkan untuk kepribadian Neuroticisme beberapa penelitian menemukan memiliki korelasi yang lemah dan bahkan korelasinya negatif dengan motivasi, namun penelitian lainnya menemukan korelasinya yang kuat dan positif dengan motivasi.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allport , G. W. 1937. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York : H. Holt and Company.

Atkinson , J. W. 1957 . Motivational determinants of risk - taking behavior . Psychological Review, 64 , 359 – 372

Atkinson , J. W & Birch , D. 1970 . The dynamics of action . New York : John Wiley .

Atkinson , J. W & Raynor , J. O. (Eds.) ( 1974 ). Motivation and achievement . New York : Winston (Halsted Press/Wiley) .

Awan, Noureen dan Naz. 2011. A Study of Relationship between Achievement Motivation, Self Concept and Achievement in English and Mathematics at Secondary Level. International Education Studies, 4(3). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.659.4037&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Campbell, J.P., & Pritchard, R.D. 1976. Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 63-130). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 63–75.

Cooper , C. 1997. Individual differences.Oxford : Oxford University Press

Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. 2000. Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of organizational Behavior, 21(1), 63-75.

Deborah, J. S. 1996. Motivation and instruction. (D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee, Eds.). New York And London: Taylor & Francis Group.

De Feyter, T., Caers, R., Vigna, C., & Berings, D. 2012. Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learning and individual Differences, 22(4), 439-448.

Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V., & Aristigueta, M. P. 2008. Managing Human Behavior in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. Sage Publications, Inc. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 944-952.

Eysenck , M. W. 1994 . Individual differences: Normal and abnormal . Hove : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fleeson , W. 2001. Toward a structure - and process - integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 80 (6),1011 1027 .

Furnham, A., Eracleous, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality, motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five. Journal of managerial psychology, 24(8), 765-779.

Gellatly, I. R. (1996). Conscientiousness and task performance: Test of cognitive process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 474.

Gruszka , A., Matthews , G., & Szymura , B. (Eds.) ( 2010 ). Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory and executive control . New York : Springer.

Hart, J. W., Stasson, M. F., Mahoney, J. M., & Story, P. 2007. The Big Five and Achievement Motivation: Exploring the Relationship Between Personality and a Two-Factor Model of Motivation. Individual Differences Research, 5(4).

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. 2002. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 797.

Kanfer, R., Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. 1996. Motivational skills & self-regulation for learning: A trait perspective. Learning and individual differences, 8(3), 185-209.

Kanfer, R., & Heggestad, E. D. 1997. Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 19, 1997, 19, 1-56.

Komarraju, M., & Karau, S. J. 2005. The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and individual differences, 39(3), 557-567.

Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. 2009. Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and individual differences, 19(1), 47-52.

Lawler, E. E. 1994. Motivation in Work Organizations (Jossey Bass Business and Management Series). Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.

Leary , M., & Hoyle , R. H. (Eds.) .2009. Handbook of individual differences in social behavior . New York : Guilford Press.

Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. 2006. Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of applied psychology, 91(4), 927.

Muola, J.M. 2010. A study of the relationship between academic achievement motivation and home environment among standard eight pupils. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(5): 213-217.

Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. 2009. Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model. The Journal of social psychology, 149(5), 545-561.

Published
2021-06-30