Studi Perbandingan Pengaruh Variasi Bentuk Lengkung terhadap Stabilitas Struktur Jembatan Pelengkung: Studi Kasus Model Kompetisi Jembatan Indonesia XIX Tahun 2024

Legat Bestari; Ester Priskasari; Hadi Surya Wibawanto Sunarwadi

doi:10.30996/jspts.v6i2.132744

Authors

Legat Bestari Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang
Ester Priskasari Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang
Hadi Surya Wibawanto Sunarwadi Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/jspts.v6i2.132744

Keywords:

arch bridge, arch shape variation, indonesian bridge competition, structural stability, SAP2000

Abstract

Arch bridges represent a widely favoured structural form, celebrated for their inherent efficiency and aesthetic appeal. Variations in arch geometry, such as circular and parabolic shapes, exert a significant influence on both the structural stability and load distribution within the design. This research endeavours to conduct a comparative analysis of how distinct arch geometries—specifically circular and parabolic—impact the structural stability of arch bridges. The investigation centres on a case study utilising a model arch bridge from the 19th Indonesian Bridge Competition (KJI) in 2024. The methodology employed involves structural analysis facilitated by SAP2000 v.24 software, adhering strictly to the guidelines set forth by KJI XIX 2024 and SNI 1729:2020 for comprehensive evaluation. Key parameters subjected to analysis included internal forces, stress, strain, deflection, and material efficiency. The analytical findings reveal that the bridge model incorporating a parabolic arch demonstrates superior performance. While the maximum axial forces in the arch rib and hangers were higher in the parabolic model, this model exhibited substantially lower bending moments in the arch rib (45.36 kNmm) and longitudinal girder (32.55 kNmm) when compared to the circular arch model (86.51 kNmm and 87.41 kNmm). Furthermore, the maximum deflection observed in the parabolic model (1.75 mm) was notably less than that of the circular model (2.21 mm). In terms of material consumption, the parabolic arch bridge model proved more efficient, with a total weight of 19.19 kg, making it 51.9% lighter than the circular arch bridge model, which weighed 37 kg. In conclusion, the parabolic arch form imparts enhanced structural stability and greater material efficiency, proving more effective in channelling loads primarily into pure compressive forces, thereby mitigating overall bending moments and deformations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonim. (2020). SNI 1729:2020 Spesifikasi untuk Bangunan Gedung Baja Struktural. Jakarta: Badan Standarisasi Nasional.

Sukirno, Fahimuddin, F., Purnomo, H., Budio, S. P., Amalia, & Prihutomo, N. B. (2024). Pedoman Kompetisi Jembatan Indonesia XIX Tahun 2024. Jakarta: Balai Pengembangan Talenta Indonesia, Pusat Prestasi Nasional, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Paransa, F. A. J. (2020). Studi Perbandingan Pengaruh Variasi Tinggi Lengkung terhadap Panjang Bentang 120 Meter pada Jembatan Rangka Tipe Menerus: Studi Kasus Jembatan Dian Pulau–Tetoat. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Zaini, M., Suprapto. (2018). Analisis Optimalisasi Tinggi Fokus (f) Pelengkung pada Perencanaan Jembatan Lengkung Tipe Lantai Atas (Arch Bridge Deck Type). Vol. 2 No. 2/REKAT/18 (2018): Wisuda ke-92 Periode 2 Tahun 2018.

Almulianur, A., Aminullah, A., Muslikh, M. (2018). Optimasi Geometri Berdaraskan Gaya-Gaya Dalam Pada Jembatan Pelengkung Beton. INERSIA, Vol XIV No. 2.

Kumalasari, I (2017). Efisiensi Profil Rangka Baja pada Jembatan Lantai Atas dan Lantai Bawah terhadap Variasi Tinggi Rangka. Tugas Akhir. (Tidak Diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Maisyarah, F (2015). Studi Perbandingan Tinggi Busur terhadap Bentang Utama pada Jembatan Busur Rangka Baja Tipe A Half-Through Arch Bridge. Tugas Akhir. (Tidak Diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Struyk, H.J. et al. (1984). Jembatan. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.

Wen, L. Q. et al. (2010). Stability Analysis of Special-Shape Arch Bridge. Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering. Taiwan.

Ramachandran, M., Zhang, Y., & Singh, A. (2018). Comparative Study of Structural Behavior in Arch Bridges with Varying Geometric Configurations. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 23(4), 04018014.

Austin, W.J., & Ross, T.J. (1976). Elastic Buckling of Arches under Symmetrical Loading, Journal of Stuctural Division ASCE, Vol. 120, 1085-1095