Hypocrisies Of Democracy: Existence Of Community Organization And State Control

  • Anggie Parawitha Lucca Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
Keywords: community organization, hypocrisy democracy, state control

Abstract

The study of democratic hypocrisy is mainly related to state control of people’s freedom to associate and assemble, and Strategies to overcome them in Indonesia have not been comprehensive in analyzing qualitatively and identifying the emergence of social movements and what makes community organizations strong. This article aims to describe and analyze the causes of a country with a democratic system that guarantees freedom of association and assembly, plus the statement of the President Joko Widodo regime, which urges the public to be active in criticizing the government instead to act repressively and the causes of social movements through community organizations to become strong. This research was conducted by observing community organizations (Ormas) and studying literature. The results showed that repressive actions until the dissolution of mass organizations were carried out because the more significant the threat of a social movement, social movement organization, or protest activity against the government and government elites, the more possible repressive actions will be carried out. Meanwhile, what makes mass organizations exist is analyzed based on the theory of the political process, in which the mass organizations make movements because they see political opportunities and then add the strength of popular organizations. Even though political and organizational opportunities alone do not quickly produce social movements, someone with his leadership is needed to fill the political opportunity and the organization’s strength, such as the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), which owns Habib Rizieq Shihab. The low level of public satisfaction with the regime also causes mass organizations’ social movements to exist increasingly, overlapping often inconsistent policies, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic, making community satisfaction decrease.

 

Keywords: Community Organization, Hipocrisy Democracy, and State Control

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Anjar, Elly Susilawati, Toni, Zunaidy Abdullah Siregar, Gomal Juni Yanris. 2021. “Kontribusi Media Sosial Terhadap Kebijakan Publik Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Penanganan COVID-19.” Jurnal Education and Development 9 (No 2 (2021)): 168–74. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/2546/1466.

Campbell, Dfj. 2008. “The Basic Concept for the Democracy Ranking of the Quality of Democracy.” Vienna: Democracy Ranking 10 (October 2008): 50. http://democracyranking.org/wordpress/ranking/2012/data/basic_concept_democracy_ranking_2008_A4.pdf.

Cunningham, Frank. 2002. Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. Dialogos. Vol. 43. London: Routledge.

Dimock. 1960. Public Administration. New York: Rineheart Inc.

Feng, C., R. Ma, and L. Jiang. 2020. “The Impact of Service Innovation on Firmperformance: A Metaanalysis.” Journal of Service Management 1. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1108/ JOSM-03-2019- 0089.

Keane, J. 2008. “Hypocrisy and Democracy.” WZB-Mitteilungen, no. Juni: 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511617423.011.

Maharani, Dewi, and Lesmana Rian Andhika. 2021. “Rational Intervention Public Policy for Public Service Innovation.” Policy & Governance Review 5 (2): 182. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v5i2.383.

Mello, Luiz de, and Teresa Ter-Minassian. 2020. “Digitalisation Challenges and Opportunities for Subnational Governments.” France. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/22265848.

Pranadji, Tri. 2012. “Naskah Akademik RUU Organisasi Kemasyarakatan.” Jakarta.

Prasetya, Genta Danu, and Novi Trisnawati. 2021. “Analisis Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (Ctl) Pada Mata Pelajaran Otomatisasi Tata Kelola Humas Dan Keprotokolan Kelas Xi OTKP Di SMK Negeri 2 Tuban.” Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP) 9: 143–53. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpap/article/view/9248.

Rodeck, David. 2021. “What Is A Recession?” Forbes.Com. 2021.

Sodaro, Michael J. 2004. Comparative Politics. A Global Introduction. New York: Mc. Graw Hill.

Baechler, Jean. 1995. Democracy an Analytical Survey. USA: Unesco.

Cook, Brian J. 2007. Democracy and Administration; Woodrow Wilson’s Ideas and The Challenges of Public Management. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gibson, Ivancevich, and Donnely. 1987. Organisasi Dan Manajemen: Perilaku, Struktur Dan Proses. 5th ed. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Keane, J. 2008. “Hypocrisy and Democracy.” WZB-Mitteilungen, no. Juni: 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511617423.011.

Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (2004): 125–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545.

Pranadji, Tri. 2012. “Naskah Akademik RUU Organisasi Kemasyarakatan.” Jakarta.

Schmitt, Carl. 1988. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Taufiqurokhman. 2014. Kebijakan Publik. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Moestopo Beragama Pers. Jakarta Pusat: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Moestopo Beragama Pers.

Team InfoDev and The Center for Democracy & Technology. 2002. “The E-Government Hanbook for Developing Countries.” USA.

The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2020. “Democracy Index 2020 In Sickness and in Health?” London.

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Institutions Work. Princeton University Press. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3816.2004.286_15.x.

Published
2022-08-18
How to Cite
Lucca, A. (2022). Hypocrisies Of Democracy: Existence Of Community Organization And State Control. JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 8(1), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.30996/jpap.v8i1.7019