Marginalizing and Distracting: Digital Technology Integration in Kurikulum Merdeka
Abstract
The implementation of Indonesia’s Kurikulum Merdeka aims to transform education through student-centered learning and digital technology integration. However, this study reveals significant challenges that hinder its success. Drawing on recent surveys, case examples, and literature, the findings highlight how economic and infrastructural barriers marginalize both teachers and students, limiting access to essential digital tools and reliable internet. Moreover, while digital technologies offer promising educational affordances, their use also introduces distractions that can undermine learning outcomes. These tensions expose a gap between the curriculum’s visionary goals and the practical realities faced in diverse educational contexts. The study underscores the urgent need for targeted policy interventions to improve digital equity, support teachers, and develop strategies to manage technology use effectively. Implications for curriculum design and recommendations for future research on digital inclusion and distraction management are discussed to guide the evolution of Kurikulum Merdeka towards a more equitable and effective education system.Downloads
References
Aagaard, J. (2018). Magnetic and multistable: reinterpreting the affordances of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0088-4
Aagaard, J. (2022). Taming unruly beings: students, discipline and educational technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1981993
Adara, R. A., & Haqiyah, A. (2021). Improving Indonesian EFL learners’ motivation through computer assisted language learning (CALL). Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v6i1.9119
Adara, R. A., & Najmudin, O. (2020). Analysis on the differences in EFL learners’ demotivating factors after Covid 19 pandemic. Ta’dib, 23(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v23i2.2373
Adara, R. A., Nuryadi, N., & Nasution, R. A. (2019). Investigating the difference in demotivation factors: A case study of two groups of Indonesian EFL Learners. Journal of English Language Studies, 4(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v4i2.6228
Akhmadi, A. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 11(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v11i1.310
Aliu, J., & Oke, A. E. (2023). Construction in the digital age: Exploring the benefits of digital technologies. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 13(3), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2022-0186
An, T., & Oliver, M. (2021). What in the world is educational technology? Rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066
Aranditio, S. (2025, January 22). Guru kini tidak perlu lagi buat konten Aksi Nyata. Kompas.
Ben Gurion, S., & Nasir, N. (2024). Teacher readiness in implementing “the Merdeka Curriculum.” Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 5(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v5i1.321
Berthelsen, U. D., & Tannert, M. (2020). Utilizing the affordances of digital learning materials. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 20(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2020.20.02.03
Bower, M. (2008). Affordance analysis – Matching learning tasks with learning technologies. Educational Media International, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980701847115
Bower, M., & Sturman, D. (2015). What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Computers and Education, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.013
Cheng, L. (2024). Educational affordances of music video games and gaming mobile apps. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 33(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2319171
Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). Understanding and using technological affordances: a response to Boyle and Cook. ALT-J, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776042000259609
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., & McCoy, W. N. (2023). Mixed methods research proposal. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) (pp. 729–738). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11074-7
Derry, J. (2007). Epistemology and conceptual resources for the development of learning technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00246.x
Drennan, G., & Moll, I. (2018). A conceptual understanding of how educational technology coaches help teachers integrate iPad affordances into their teaching. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(2).
Flanigan, A. E., & Titsworth, S. (2020). The impact of digital distraction on lecture note taking and student learning. Instructional Science, 48(5), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09517-2
Flerlage, C., Bernholt, A., & Parchmann, I. (2023). Motivation to use digital educational content - Differences between science and other STEM students in higher education. Chemistry Teacher International, 5(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0035
Freire, P. (2021). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. In Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1766207
Gibson, J. J. (2017). The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.2.03bli
Grant, L., & Eynon, R. (2017). Digital divides and social justice in technology-enhanced learning. In Technology Enhanced Learning: Research Themes. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02600-8_15
Güngör, E., & Kurt, A. A. (2024). Teachers’ views on digital distraction. Participatory Educational Research, 11(H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.92.11.6
Gurung, R. A. R. (2024, September 1). Fostering learning in a world of technological distractions. American Psychological Association.
Haeri, I. Z. (2024, December 28). Guru badut. Kompas.
Haeri, I. Z., & Afriansyah, A. (2024). Eksplorasi beban digital guru: Survei pemanfaatan platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM) oleh guru. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 15(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v15i2.4615
Hall, R. (2011). Revealing the transformatory moment of learning technology: The place of critical social theory. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.624996
Hidayat, R. (2024, May 3). Pendidikan dan ketimpangan struktural. Kompas.
Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2013). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. In Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203054000
Lee, J. S., Xie, Q., & Lee, K. (2024). Informal digital learning of English and L2 willingness to communicate: roles of emotions, gender, and educational stage. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(2), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1918699
Leonardo, Z. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033006011
Ma, Y., Wang, S., Sun, W., Yu, Y., & Bian, J. (2021). Research on the construction and optimization of distributed Moodle course platform. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(2), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22276
Macedo, D., & Bartolome, L. I. (2016). Dancing with bigotry: Beyond the politics of tolerance. In Dancing With Bigotry: Beyond the Politics of Tolerance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10952-1
Macgilchrist, F. (2021). What is ‘critical’ in critical studies of edtech? Three responses. In Learning, Media and Technology (Vol. 46, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1958843
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
McGarr, O. (2024). Teacher educators’ views and responses to digital distraction in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104701
McLaren, P. (2002). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture. In Critical Pedagogy and Predatory Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203203194
Mellor, D. (2013). Critical theory of education. In Sociology of Education: An A-to-Z Guide (1st ed., Vol. 2, pp. 165–167). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276151.n96
Nami, F. (2022). Edmodo in semi-technical English courses: towards a more practical strategy for language learning/practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1533–1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1819340
Nisa, S. K., Yoenanto, N. H., & Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2023). Hambatan dan solusi dalam implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada jenjang sekolah dasar: Sebuah kajian literatur. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(3), 287–298.
Norman, D. (2016). The design of everyday things. In The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800648108
Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
Oliver, M. (2024). Education and the decadence of technology. IIS University Journal of Arts, 13(2), 1–27.
Otoo, S., Korang, T., Alzaid, A., Otayn, K., & Cifuentes, L. (2020). The Role of Critical Theory in Learning Technologies Implementation in a Global Society. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 380–384.
Prasetyo, A. Y. (2025, May 3). Hardiknas dan Ketimpangan Akses Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia. Kompas.
Puspita, M. D. (2024, May 4). Top 10 countries with cheapest mobile internet service; Is Indonesia included? Tempo.
Putri, N. I. (2023). Hambatan guru dalam penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka terhadap proses pembelajaran di SD Negeri 3 Brosot. Indonesian Journal of Elementary Education (IJOEE), 5(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijoee.v5i1.8943
Rafalow, M. H. (2020). Digital divisions. How schools create inequality in the tech era. (1st ed., Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
Rumiati, R., Ayuni, R. P., Wulandari, R., Saputri, S. D., & Monica, T. (2024). Hambatan dan tantangan dalam penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka terhadap proses pembelajaran di SDN 1 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.47134/pgsd.v1i3.272
Ryane, I., & el faddouli, N. (2020). A Case Study of Using Edmodo to Enhance Computer Science Learning for Engineering Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(03), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11252
Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
Selwyn, N., & Aagaard, J. (2021). Banning mobile phones from classrooms—An opportunity to advance understandings of technology addiction, distraction and cyberbullying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12943
Sharma, L. R. (2022). Identifying the benefits and challenges of digital technology and online learning. International Research Journal of MMC, 3(2), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v3i2.46297
Shofa, J. N. (2025, June 25). Indonesia has highest costs of doing business in ASEAN-5. Jakarta Globe.
Statista. (2024, June 1). Average price of smartphones in the Asia-Pacific region in 2023, by country. Statista.
Swauger, S. (2020). Our bodies encoded: Algorithmic test proctoring in higher education. In Critical digital pedagogy.
Sya’ro, A. Z., & Dewi, E. P. (2022). Effect of educational content creators on student motivation and learning outcomes in the pandemic COVID-19. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v1i1.47983
Timmis, S., & Muhuro, P. (2019). De-coding or de-colonising the technocratic university? Rural students’ digital transitions to South African higher education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1623250
Vermaat, M. E., Sebok, S. L., Freund, S. M., Campbell, J. T., & Frydenberg, M. (2017). Discovering Computers© 2018: Digital Technology, Data, and Devices. Cengage Learning.
Copyright (c) 2025 Reza Anggriyashati Adara, Ernie Victorynie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors whose manuscript is published will approve the following provisions:
-
The right to publication of all journal material published on the jurnal anaphora website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
-
The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which means Jurnal Persona reserves the right to store, modify the format, administer in database, maintain and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
-
Printed and electronic published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
