OVERCOMING SLUM SETTLEMENTS: LESSON LEARNED FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF UNINHABITABLE HOUSE SOCIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM IN SURABAYA
Abstract
Slum areas can generate bad impacts on health and the environment. Thus, the government of Surabaya city arranges TAHU PANAS innovation through a social rehabilitation program for unfit for habitation to overcome. The program has achieved good output. This is evidenced by an increase in program beneficiaries every year, a decrease in the percentage of slum areas, and an award from the Ministry of PANRB as an outstanding innovation. This research aimed to determine and describe the success of the implementation process of this program in overcoming slum settlements in Surabaya city. The success of this implementation can be understood by the theory of policy implementation by Hill & Hupe as an analysis tool. We used qualitative methods through document analysis to discuss these issues. The results showed that the implementation process seen from the characteristics of the policy was optimal because the level of ambiguity and conflict was low; policy formation is adequate in terms of policy objectives, policy standards or targets, human and financial resources as well as incentive policies; the policy transfer process is quite clear and detailed; the effect of the implementor response is quite optimal both in terms of disposition and behavior; horizontal relations between organizations are adequate; positive target group response; and the policy environment that has supported the running of the policy. The implementation process in this program to tackle slum settlements in the city of Surabaya is optimal enough, thus, successful implementation can be achieved.
Downloads
References
Adusei, P. K., Oduro-Ofori, E., Amponsah, O., & Agyeman, K. O. (2018). Participatory incremental slum upgrading towards sustainability: an assessment of slum dwellers’ willingness and ability to pay for utility services. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(6), 2501–2520.
Amir, A. L., Puspitaningtyas, A., & Santosa, H. R. (2015). Dwellers participation to achieve livable housing in Grudo rental flats. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 179, 165–175.
Andini, I. (2013). Sikap dan Peran Pemerintah Kota Surabaya Terhadap Perbaikan Daerah Kumuh di Kelurahan Tanah Kalikedinding Kota Surabaya. Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 1(1), 36–47.
Bappeko. (2018a). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kota Surabaya tahun 2016 – 2021. Surabaya: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Kota Surabaya.
Bappeko. (2018b). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Daerah (RPJPD) Kota Surabaya Tahun 2005–2025. Surabaya: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Kota Surabaya.
Bappeko. (2019). Laporan Keterangan Pertanggungjawaban (LKPJ) Walikota Akhir Tahun Anggaran 2018 Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Surabaya: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Kota Surabaya.
Bhatta, G. (2006). International Dictionary of Public Management and Governance. New York: ME Sharpe Inc.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27.
BPS. (2019a). Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Provinsi Jawa Timur Menurut Kabupaten/Kota, 2013-2018. Retrieved from https://jatim.bps.go.id/statictable/2019/10/11/1861/indeks-pembangunanmanusia-di-provinsi-jawa-timur-menurutkabupaten-kota-2013-2018-.html
BPS. (2019b). Kepadatan Penduduk Pertengahan Tahun Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Timur (per km2), 2014-2017. Retrieved from Surabaya: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur website: https://jatim.bps.go.id/statictable/2019/10/15/1925/kepadatan-penduduk-pertengahan-tahun-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-jawa-timur-per-km2-2014-2017-.html
BPS. (2019c). Penduduk, Laju Pertumbuhan Penduduk, Distribusi Persentase Penduduk, Kepadatan Penduduk, Rasio Jenis Kelamin Penduduk Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Timur, 2000, 2010 dan 2018. Retrieved from Surabaya: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur website: https://jatim.bps.go.id/statictable/2019/10/09/1614/penduduk-laju-pertumbuhan-penduduk-distribusi-persentase-penduduk-kepadatan-penduduk-rasio-jenis-kelamin-penduduk-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-jawa-timur-2000-2010-dan-2018.html
BPS. (2020). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat Kota Surabaya 2020. Surabaya: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya.
Brueckner, J. K., Mation, L., & Nadalin, V. G. (2019). Slums in Brazil: Where are they located, who lives in them, and do they ‘squeeze’the formal housing market? Journal Of Housing Economics, 44, 48–60.
Chowdhury, F. J., & Amin, A. T. M. N. (2006). Environmental assessment in slum improvement programs: some evidence from a study on infrastructure projects in two Dhaka slums. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(6), 530–552.
Christiawan, E. S. (2019). Nilai Publik (Public Value) dari Program Rehabilitasi Sosial Rumah Tidak Layak Huni di Kota Surabaya. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
Cities-Alliance. (1999). Cities without Slums: Action Plan for Moving Slum Upgrading to Scale. Washington, DC: Cities Alliance.
Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
Conyers, D., & Hills, P. (1990). An Introduction to Development Planning in The Third World. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Danso-Wiredu, E. Y., & Midheme, E. (2017). Slum upgrading in developing countries: lessons from Ghana and Kenya. Ghana Journal of Geography, 9(1), 88–108.
Das, A. (2015). Participatory Slum Upgrading: Lessons from Post-Decentralization India and Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Regional Development and Environment, 1, 15–34.
Das, A. K., & Takahashi, L. M. (2009). Evolving Institutional Arrangements, Scaling Up, and Sustainability: Emerging Issues in Participatory Slum Upgrading in Ahmedabad, India. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(2), 213–232.
Doe, B., Peprah, C., & Chidziwisano, J. R. (2020). Sustainability of slum upgrading interventions: Perception of low-income households in Malawi and Ghana. Cities, 107, 102946.
Dolowitz, D. P., Hulme, R., Nellis, M., & O’Neill, F. (2000). Policy Transfer and British Social Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23.
Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Eriza, A. H. (2015). Evaluasi Program Rehabilitasi Sosial Daerah Kumuh (RSDK) dalam Kegiatan Perbaikan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni di Kelurahan Wonorejo Kecamatan Tegalsari Kota Surabaya. Publika, 3(7).
Ferguson, B., & Navarrete, J. (2003). A financial framework for reducing slums: lessons from experience in Latin America. Environment and Urbanization, 15(2), 201–216.
Firdaus, F. (2016). Pemenuhan Hak Atas Perumahan yang Layak Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Kota dalam Perspektif HAM (The Fulfillment of Right on Adequate Housing to the Urban Poor in Human Rights Perspective). Jurnal HAM, 7(2), 85–97.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Jain, A. K. (2010). Inclusive Planning and Social Infrastructure. New Delhi: Bookwell.
Jones, C. O. (2004). Pengantar Kebijakan Publik (terjemahan). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Jones, P. (2017). Formalizing the Informal: Understanding the Position of Informal Settlements and Slums in Sustainable Urbanization Policies and Strategies in Bandung, Indonesia. Sustainability, 9(8), 1436.
Kawer, O. F. S., Baiquni, M., Keban, Y. T., & Subarsono, A. (2018). Implementasi Kebijakan Pembangunan Rumah Layak Huni dengan Pendekatan Hibrida di Kabupaten Supiori Provinsi Papua. Sosiohumaniora, 20(3), 245–253.
Kompas.com. (2018). Surabaya Sabet 3 Penghargaan Top 99 Inovasi Layanan Publik. Retrieved from https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/09/20/15173961/surabaya-sabet-3-penghargaan-top-99-inovasi-layanan-publik?page=all
Koswara, I., & Mulyana, S. (2016). Implementasi Model Komunikasi Kelompok Fasilitator dalam Pelaksanaan Program Rutilahu di Kota Cimahi. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 4(2), 199–206.
Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-Level Bureaucracy and The Analysis of Urban Reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409.
MENPANRB. (2020). Warga Surabaya Nikmati Rumah Layak Huni Berkat “Tahu Panas.” Retrieved November 5, 2020, from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/warga-surabaya-nikmati-rumah-layak-huni-berkat-tahu-panas
Mitra, S., Mulligan, J., Schilling, J., Harper, J., Vivekananda, J., & Krause, L. (2017). Developing risk or resilience? Effects of slum upgrading on the social contract and social cohesion in Kibera, Nairobi. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), 103–122.
Nassar, D. M., & Elsayed, H. G. (2018). From Informal Settlements to Sustainable Communities. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 2367–2376.
Neuman, W. L. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.
Ooi, G. L., & Phua, K. H. (2007). Urbanization and Slum Formation. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84(1), 27–34.
Otsuki, K. (2016). Infrastructure in informal settlements: co-production of public services for inclusive governance. Local Environment, 21(12), 1557–1572.
Owen, J. M., & Rogers, P. (1999). Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Pratama, F. A. K., & Niswah, F. (2021). Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Hidup melalui Program Tahu Panas (Tak Takut Kehujanan, Tak Takut Kepanasan) oleh Dinas Sosial Kota Surabaya. Publika, 9(1), 295–306.
radarsurabaya.jawapos.com. (2020). Dinas Sosial Tambah 100 Rumah Tidak Layak Huni untuk Dibedah. Retrieved from https://radarsurabaya.jawapos.com/read/2020/10/22/220437/dinas-sosial-tambah-100-rumah-tidak-layak-huni-untuk-dibedah
Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1982). Bureaucracy and Policy Implementation. Homewood, III: Dorsey Press.
Rofiah, S., & Nawang, E. R. (2019). Peran Dinas Sosial Kota Surabaya dalam Pelaksanaan Program Rehabilitasi Sosial Daerah Kumuh (RSDK) di Surabaya. Public Administration Journal of Research, 1(3), 244–259.
Sabarisman, M. (2013). Perspektif Komitmen Tim Kerja dalam Pengembangan Rumah Layak Huni Bagi Keluarga Miskin di Bondowoso. Sosio Konsepsia, 3(1), 111–122.
Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework of Analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x
Shi, Q., & Cao, G. (2020). Urban spillover or rural industrialisation: Which drives the growth of Beijing Metropolitan Area. Cities, 105, 102354.
Srinivas, H. (2015). Defining Squatter Settlements: GDRC Research Output E-036. Kobe, Japan: Global Development Research Center.
Statistik, B. P. (2020). Kota Surabaya Dalam Angka 2020. Penyediaan Data Untuk Perencanaan Pembangunan.
surabaya.tribunnews.com. (2019). Program Bedah Rumah, Dinsos Surabaya Cari 1.000 Rumah Tidak Layak Huni. Retrieved from https://surabaya.tribunnews.com/2019/11/15/program-bedah-rumah-dinsos-surabaya-cari-1000-rumah-tidak-layak-huni
Suradi, S. (2016). Model Identifikasi Permasalahan Sosial di Kawasan Kumuh Perkotaan. Sosio Informa, 1(2), 106–120.
Surya, B., Syafri, S., Hadijah, H., Baharuddin, B., Fitriyah, A. T., & Sakti, H. H. (2020). Management of Slum-Based Urban Farming and Economic Empowerment of the Community of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Sustainability, 12(18), 7324.
Taher, M. T., & Ibrahim, A. (2014). Transformation of Slum and Squatter Settlements: A Way of Sustainable Living in Context of 21st Century Cities. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2(2), 70–76.
Turok, I. (2015). Upgrade informal settlements: South Africa. New Agenda: South African Journal of Social and Economic Policy, 11–15.
Tursilarini, T. Y., & Udiati, T. (2020). Dampak Bantuan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni (RTLH) bagi Kesejahteraan Sosial Keluarga Penerima Manfaat di Kabupaten Bangka. Media Informasi Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial, 44(1), 1–21.
UN-Habitat. (2003). The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements. United Nations – Human Settlements Programme.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
Wibowo, W. A. (2012). Kolaborasi Antar Stakeholder dalam Pelaksanaan Program Perbaikan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni Kota Surakarta. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Wood, L. M., Sebar, B., & Vecchio, N. (2020). Application of Rigour and Credibility in Qualitative Document Analysis: Lessons Learnt from a Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 25(2), 456–470.
Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation–The Program Evaluation Standards: A Guide for Evaluators and Evaluation Users (3rd Edition). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Zhang, Y. (2018). The credibility of slums: Informal housing and urban governance in India. Land Use Policy, 79, 876–890.
The DiA journal allows authors to retain the copyright of their papers without limitation. Authors may grant publishers non-exclusive publishing rights to publish articles. Granting first publishing rights to publishers also qualifies as unlimited copyright (because there are no restrictions imposed by publishers on author copyright).
