CAPABILITIES OF THE EDUCATION AND CULTURE OFFICE IN HERITAGE TOURISM MANAGEMENT IN THE CITY OF SUKABUMI

  • Suci Dwi Utari Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi
  • Dian Purwanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi
  • Andi Mulyadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi
Keywords: Heritage Tourism, Capability, Culture

Abstract

This study aims to determine the capability of the Office of Education and Culture in managing heritage tourism in Sukabumi City. The research method in this study uses a qualitative research type, with 4 informants through observation, interview, and documentation data collection techniques. The results found that overall, the management of heritage tourism in Sukabumi City can be said to be good and quite effective. However, in practice, a holistic approach is needed that includes better coordination between institutions, increased promotional efforts and legal improvements, as well as active community involvement to ensure more effective preservation and promotion of cultural heritage. In addition, researchers found that the biggest challenges faced in the management of cultural heritage in Sukabumi City include legal aspects, budgeting, and conflicts of interest between institutions. The importance of a strong legal stipulation related to cultural heritage was highlighted. Meanwhile, cooperation between institutions such as the Culture Office, Tourism Office, and Archives Office needs to be strengthened to better promote destinations and maintain cultural heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Suci Dwi Utari, Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi

Student at Public Administration Department, Faculty Of Administration And Humanities, Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi, Indonesia

Dian Purwanti, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi

Lecturer at Public Administration Department, Faculty Of Administration And Humanities, Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi, Indonesia

Andi Mulyadi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi

Lecturer at Public Administration Department, Faculty Of Administration And Humanities, Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi, Indonesia

References

Amir M. Taufik. (2011). Manajemen Bencana Dan Kapabilitas Pemerintah Lokal, Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Andrew, F Sikula. (2007). Sistem Manajemen Kinerja, Edisi Terjemahan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Daerah Kota Sukabumi, (2020), Peraturan Daerah Kota Sukabumi Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Cagar Budaya

Daerah Kota Sukabumi, (2020), Peraturan Wali Kota Sukabumi Nomor 59 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kedudukan.

Githa, I. A., Amanulloh, M. R. A., Dharmawan, R., & Sari, E. P. (2020). Pengembangan Indigenous tourism dengan perspektif dynamic governance (Studi pada kampung heritage kayutangan kota Malang). Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(1), 12-25.

Kusumasari, B. (2014). Manajemen bencana dan kapabilitas Pemerintah Lokal. Penerbit Gava Media.

Maryani. (1991). Pengantar Geografi Pariwisata. Bandung: IKIP Bandung.

Murtikasari, R. A., & Tukiman, T. (2021). Development of Tourism Village Through CBT Approach in Kayutangan Heritage Village, Malang City. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 19(1), 314-327.

Poerwadarminta W.J.S. (1976). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka.

Rahmawati, M., Purnomo, A., & Idris, I. (2021). Kapabilitas Masyarakat dalam Mengelola Kampoeng Heritage Kajoetangan Kota Malang. Media Komunikasi Geografi, 22(1), 01-13.

Republik Indonesia, (2010), Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya

Republik Indonesia, (2009), Undang-Undang Nomor 10 tahun 2009 Tentang Kepariwisataan

Sampurno. (2011). Manajemen Strategi. Gajah Mada University Press.

Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Siswanto, H.B. (2005). Pengantar Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Yoeti, Oka . (1985). Pemasaran Pariwisata. Bandung: Angkasa.

Published
2024-12-01
How to Cite
Utari, S., Purwanti, D., & Mulyadi, A. (2024). CAPABILITIES OF THE EDUCATION AND CULTURE OFFICE IN HERITAGE TOURISM MANAGEMENT IN THE CITY OF SUKABUMI. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 22(02), 278-296. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v22i02.10059
Section
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION