PROTECTION OF FEMALE MIGRANT WORKERS: AN ANALYSIS OF POWER HEGEMONY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SAUDI ARABIA
Abstract
This study examines the hegemony of power and protection policies for female migrant workers through a case study of Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. Since the 1970s, the oil boom in Saudi Arabia has increased the demand for migrant workers, including those from Indonesia. The Kafala system implemented in Saudi Arabia gives employers full control over migrant workers, often leading to exploitation and human rights abuses. This study explores how the hegemony of power and economic factors influence the protection of female migrant workers. Using a qualitative approach, this research collects data through in-depth interviews and policy document analysis. The findings show that despite efforts by the Indonesian government to protect female migrant workers, the hegemony of power in Saudi Arabia and exploitative economic structures remain major obstacles. This study highlights the need for reform of the Kafala system and increased bilateral cooperation between Indonesia and Saudi Arabia to ensure better protection for female migrant workers. These findings make an important contribution to the literature on labor migration and protection policies and offer practical recommendations for policymakers in both countries.
Downloads
References
Adham, A. (2023). Structural demand for migrant Labor: a bottom-up analysis of Labor market segmentation in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(7), 1746–1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1979390
Al Qurtuby, S. (2017). Arabs and “Indo-Arabs” in Indonesia: Historical Dynamics, Social Relations and Contemporary Changes. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 13(2), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2017.13.2.3
Al Qurtuby, S., & Aldamer, S. (2018). Saudi-Indonesian Relations: Historical Dynamics and Contemporary Development. In Source: Asian Perspective (Vol. 42, Issue 1).
AlShehabi, O. H. (2021). Policing Labor in empire: the modern origins of the Kafala sponsorship system in the Gulf Arab States. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 48(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2019.1580183
Asian Labor Migration: Issues and Challenges in an Era of Globalization Piyasiri Wickramasekera. (2002).
Ayuningtyasa, A., & Yuniza, M. E. (2022). Indonesian Government Intervention in the Management of Indonesian Migrant Workers’ Remittances: Is It Constitutionally Justified? Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 15(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0066
Azhiim, R. A., & Bastari, G. R. (2019). A Disciplined Freedom: The Paradox of Labor Rights in Post-Reformasi Indonesia. PCD Journal, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.36026
Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933
Bel-Air, F. D. (2015). The Socio-political Background and Stakes of ‘Saudizing’ the Workforce in Saudi arabia: the Nitaqat policy. Gulf Research Center.
BP2MI. (2020). Sejarah Pekerja Migran Indonesia. Badan Pelindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia. Retrieved Mei 27, 2024, from https://BP2MI.go.id/profil-sejarah#:~:text=Sejarah%20PMI%20Pada%20masa%20sebelum%20kemerdekaan%20Indonesia%2C%20migrasi,Amerika%20Selatan%2C%20yang%20juga%20merupakan%20wilayah%20koloni%20Belanda.
Britannica. (2024, April 24). Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) | History, Member Countries, Purpose, & Summits. Britannica. Retrieved May 27, 2024, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Gulf-Cooperation-Council
Carroll, W. (2007). Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony in a Global Field. Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 36–66. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v1i1.980
Demography, Migration and Labor Market in Saudi Arabia. (2014). Gulf Labor Markets and Migration.
Fernandez, B. (2021). Racialised institutional humiliation through the Kafala. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(19), 4344–4361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1876555
Gill, S. R., & Law, D. (1989). Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523
Hadiz, V. R. (2002). THE INDONESIAN LABOR MOVEMENT: Resurgent or Constrained? In Source: Southeast Asian Affairs.
Halabi, R. (n.d.). Human Rights & Human Welfare Human Rights & Human Welfare Contract Enslavement of Female Migrant Domestic Workers in Contract Enslavement of Female Migrant Domestic Workers in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/hrhw/vol8/iss1/31
Hammer, A., & Adham, A. (2023). Mobility Power, State and the ‘Sponsored Labor Regime’ in Saudi Capitalism. Work, Employment and Society, 37(6), 1497–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221080373
Johnson, R. (2007). Post-hegemony?: I Don’t Think So. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075958
Kapiszewski, A. (2006). United Nations Expert Group Meeting On International Migration And Development In The Arab Region Population Division Arab Versus Asian Migrant Workers In The Gcc Countries*.
Karim, M. F. (2017). Institutional Dynamics of Regulatory Actors in the Recruitment of Migrant Workers: The Case of Indonesia. In Asian Journal of Social Science (Vol. 45, Issues 4–5, pp. 440–464). Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04504004
Kelly, K. C., Restu, U., & Indriyany, I. A. (2022). Hegemony of Saudi Arabia’s Kafala System in The Relationship Between Employer and Indonesian Female Domestic Migrant Workers 2018-2020. International Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.57266/ijssr.v3i1.83
Lim, L. L., & Oishi, N. (1996). International Labor Migration of Asian Women: Distinctive Characteristics and Policy Concerns. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 5(1), 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719689600500105
McSweeney, J. (2014). The absence of class: Critical development, NGOs and the misuse of Gramsci’s concept of counter-hegemony. Progress in Development Studies, 14(3), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414521339
Morton, A. D. (2003). Social Forces in the Struggle over Hegemony: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Political Economy. Rethinking Marxism, 15(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/0893569032000113514
Mueller, J. L. (2011). The IMF, Neoliberalism and Hegemony. Global Society, 25(3), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2011.577032
Nabila, A. H. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Pekerja Migran Indonesia Sektor Rumah Tangga. Jurist-Diction, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i1.32741
Parreñas, R. S. (2000). Migrant Filipina Domestic Workers And The International Division Of Reproductive Labor. Gender & Society, 14(4), 560–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014004005
Parrenas, R. S. (2000). Migrant Filipina Domestic Workers And The International Division Of Reproductive Labor. Gender & Society, 14(4), 560–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014004005
Parreñas, R. S., Silvey, R., Hwang, M. C., & Choi, C. A. (2019). Serial Labor Migration: Precarity and Itinerancy among Filipino and Indonesian Domestic Workers. International Migration Review, 53(4), 1230–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318804769
Platt, M. (2018). Migration, Moralities and Moratoriums: Female Labor Migrants and the Tensions of Protectionism in Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 42(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2017.1408571
Sarwono, B. (2014). The never-ending problem named female migrant workers: A critical discourse analysis of Indonesian media. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 3(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms.3.1.11_1
Silvey, R. (2004). Transnational domestication: state power and Indonesian migrant women in Saudi Arabia. Political Geography, 23(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.015
Soetjiptio, A. (2017). Kebijakan Negara terhadap PRT Migran di Indonesia: Telaah Gender dan Hubungan Internasional. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 19(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v19i1.388
Solechan, S., Utami, T. R., & Azhar, M. (2020). Upaya Meningkatkan Jaminan Perlindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i1.153-161
Stoddart, M. C. J. (2007). Ideology, Hegemony, Discourse: A Critical Review of Theories of Knowledge and Power. In Thought & Research (Vol. 28). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23252126?seq=1&cid=pdf-
Tobing, C. P. (2020). Indonesia-Saudi Arabia Foreign Relations in the Context of Indonesian Workers. In International Journal on Social Science, Economics and Art (Vol. 10, Issue 1).
Yusitarani, S. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Migran Korban Perdagangan Manusia Oleh Pemerintah Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i1.24-37
United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (n.d.). International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. ohchr. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-protection-rights-all-migrant-workers
Copyright (c) 2025 Fenny Kusuma Dewi, Meidi Kosandi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The DiA journal allows authors to retain the copyright of their papers without limitation. Authors may grant publishers non-exclusive publishing rights to publish articles. Granting first publishing rights to publishers also qualifies as unlimited copyright (because there are no restrictions imposed by publishers on author copyright).