PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN THE CITY OF SURABAYA

  • Bayu Priambodo University of UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya
  • Agus Widiyarta University of UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya
Keywords: Public Private Partnership, New Public Management, Infrastructure, Transportation

Abstract

This study discusses the implementation of public-private partnerships in Surabaya in the development of transportation infrastructure. The Surabaya city government has been exploring the construction of mass transportation in the form of trams since 2010 but until now the construction of the tram has not started. The method in this research is descriptive qualitative where data collection uses literature study and analyzed using the concept of public private partnership. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of public-private partnerships in local governments is less successful. This is because the resources owned are still very limited so that many developments are stopped in the middle of the road. In addition, the implementation of public-private partnerships in developing countries is still using the traditional system. From the outside it uses the new public management but from the inside it still uses the traditional system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bayu Priambodo, University of UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya

Academic at Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya

Agus Widiyarta, University of UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya

Academic at  Public Administration Department, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya

References

Alam, q., kabir, m. H., & chaudhri, v. (2014). Managing infrastructure projects in australia: a shift from a contractual to a collaborative public management strategy. Administration & society, 46(4), 422-449.

Batley, r., & larbi, g. (2004). The changing role of government: the reform of public services in developing countries palgrave macmillan. Houndmills and new york.

Charalabidis, Y., & Koussouris, S.. Authors’ Details. Empowering Open and Kemitraan publik swasta: Technologies and Methods for Online Citizen Engagement in Public Policy Making, 283 (2012).

Chen, c., hubbard, m., & liao, c. S. (2013). When public–private partnerships fail: analysing citizen engagement in public–private partnerships–cases from taiwan and china. Public management review, 15(6), 839-857.

Cunha marques, r. U. I., & berg, s. (2011). Public‐private partnership contracts: a tale of two cities with different contractual arrangements. Public administration, 89(4), 1585-1603.

Danar, o. R., anggriawan, t., suzuki, a., novita, a. A., & pratama, m. R. (2021). Lack of kemitraan publik swasta in building community disaster resilience. Dia: jurnal administrasi publik, 19(2), 42-56.

Ismowati, m. (2016). Kajian urgensi public private partnerships di kota bandung. Transparansi jurnal ilmiah ilmu administrasi, 8(2), 141-149.

Jorna, f., wagenaar, p., das, e., & jezewski, j. (2010). Public–private partnership in poland: a cosmological journey. Administration & society, 42(6), 668-693.

Kettl, d. F. (2005). The global public management revolution: a report on the transformation of governance. Brookings institution press. Washington.

Mahmudi, m. (2005). Manajemen kinerja sektor publik. Akademi manajemen perusahaan ykpn, yogyakarta.

Ni, a. Y. (2012). The risk-averting game of transport public-private partnership: lessons from the adventure of california's state route 91 express lanes. Public performance & management review, 36(2), 253-274.

Osborne, d., & plastrik, p. (2004). Memangkas birokrasi: lima strategi menuju pemerintahan wirausaha. Penerbit ppm. Jakarta.

Osborne, d., & gaebler, t. (1995). Mewirausahakan birokrasi: reinventing government, mentransformasi semangat wirausaha ke dalam sektor publik. Pustaka binaman presindo, Jakarta.

Purwanti, N. D. Kemitraan publik swasta (Kebijakan Publik dan Pemerintahan Kolaboratif, Isu-Isu Kontemporer). Yogyakarta: Center for Policy & Management Studies FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada. Hal 178 (2016)

Rahaju, t., ma’ruf, m. F., kurniawan, b., & pradana, g. W. Penerapan etika layanan dalam perspektif kolaborasi governance pada perusahaan daerah air minum surya sembada meirinawati.

Robertson, P. J., & Choi, T. Ecological governance: Organizing principles for an emerging era. Public administration review, 70, s89-s99 (2010).

Utama, d. (2010). Prinsip dan strategi penerapan “public private partnership” dalam penyediaan infrastruktur transportasi. Jurnal sains dan teknologi indonesia, 12.

Zhang, x., & ali soomro, m. (2015). Failure path analysis with respect to private sector partners in transportation public-private partnerships. Journal of management in engineering, 32(1), 04015031.

https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/957366/149/proyek-monorel-resmi-dihentikan-1422509062

https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/meski-terkendala-dana-proyek-mrt-Surabaya-ditargetkan-selesai-2017.html

https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-3042097/belajar-dari-kasus-monorel-pemerintah-hati-hati-soal-proyek-kereta-swasta

https://www.suara.com/news/2018/12/11/134933/alasan-wali-kota-risma-gagal-bangun-proyek-trem-di-Surabaya

Published
2022-05-24
How to Cite
Priambodo, B., & Widiyarta, A. (2022). PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN THE CITY OF SURABAYA. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 20(01), 363 - 377. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v20i01.6028
Section
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION