IMPLEMENTATION OF FISHERIES UMKM POLICY IN SIMEULUE REGENCY

Authors

  • Ikhsan Ikhsan Universitas Teuku Umar
  • Cut Asmaul Husna Universitas Teuku Umar
  • Agus Pratama Universitas Teuku Umar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v20i02.7236

Keywords:

UMKM, fisheries, policy implementation, UMKM, Fisheries, Policy Implementation

Abstract

The fisheries sector is one of the leading sectors in Simeulue Regency's economy. It impacts increasing regional income, opening up employment opportunities, and improving the local community's standard of living, so fisheries UMKM policies are an important aspect of Simeulue Regency. The research method was descriptive qualitative, with field studies and interviews with policymakers and implementers from the Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (DKP), the Department of Industry, Trade, Cooperatives, and Small and Medium Enterprises (Disperindagkop) Simuelue Regency, and business actors. Furthermore, data were obtained through literature studies, which included scientific journals, government regulations, documents, and research reports. This study's analysis employs inductive logic by collecting field data and then analyzing it to conclude. The findings demonstrated that the government implemented the fisheries UMKM policy by providing business capital stimulus for UMKMs, conserving marine areas to protect fishery products, and limiting foreign ship visits to maintain marine sovereignty. The study concludes that the implementation of fisheries UMKM policies fails because: (1) there is no definite data on the number of fisheries UMKMs; (2) there is no communication and forum that can mediate the interests of UMKM business actors and the government; and (3) the government has limited budget funds in the form of business capital; and (4) UMKM business assistance and training have been provided, but have not yielded maximum results due to a lack of a market that can accommodate production results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albulescu, C.T. 2015. Banks' profitability and financial soundness indicators: a macro-level investigation in emerging countries”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 23, pp. 203-209

Bank Indonesia. 2020. Statistik Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia

Bougatef, K. 2015. The impact of corruption on the soundness of Islamic banks”, Borsa Istanbul Review, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 283-295

Bouzgarrou, H., Jouida, S., & Louhichi, W. 2017. Bank profitability during and before the financial crisis: Domestic vs. foreign banks. Research in International Business and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ribaf.2017.05.011

Ca?praru, B. & Ihnatov, I. 2014. Banks’ profitability in selected central and eastern european countries”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 16, pp. 587-591.

Daniel K, Tarus et al. 2012. Determinants of Net Interest Margins of Commercial Banks in Kenya: A Panel Study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2 (2): 199 – 208

Dietrich, A., & Wanzenried, G. 2011. Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 21, 307–327.

Dietrich, A., & Wanzenried, G. 2011. Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2010.11.002

Dietrich, A., & Wanzenried, G. 2014. The determinants of commercial banking profitability in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 54(3), 337–354. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2014.03.001

Hasibuan, Melayu SP. 2013. Dasar-dasar Perbankan.Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Kasmir. 2016. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persad

Mawardi, W. 2005. Analisis Faktor Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum di Indonesia (Studi Kasus pada Bank Umum dengan Total Asset Kurang dari 1 Triliun)”, Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, Vol.14, No.1, Juli, pp.83-94

Petria, N., Capraru, B. & Capraru, I. 2015. Determinants of banks’ profitability: evidence from EU 27 banking systems”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 20, pp. 518-524

Rachmansyah, R., Makmur, M., & Kamaruddin, K. (2017). Pendugaan Laju Sedimentasi Dan Dispersi Limbah Partikel Organik Dari Budi Daya Bandeng Dalam Keramba Jaring Apung Di Laut. Jurnal Penelitian Perikanan Indonesia, 10(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.15578/jppi.10.2.2004.89-99

Radiarta, I. N., Erlania, E., & Haryadi, J. (2018). Analisis Kesesuaian Dan Daya Dukung Perairan Untuk Pengembangan Budidaya Rumput Laut Di Kabupaten Simeulue, Aceh. Jurnal Segara, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.15578/segara.v14i1.6626

Sayuti, M., Supriatna, I., Setia Abadi, A., B. Hismayasari, I., Ernawati, E., & Saidin, S. (2021). Pelatihan produksi pakan buatan skala rumah tangga untuk pembudidaya ikan di kota Sorong, Papua Barat. Yumary : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(3), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.35912/yumary.v2i1.100

Stewart, L. &. (2000). Evolusi Kebijakan Publik.

Teh, L. C. L., & Sumaila, U. R. (2013). Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish and Fisheries, 14(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00450.x

Tridharma, J. (2019). Studi Akselerasi Pertumbuhan Sektor Perikanan Di Wilayah Pesisir Indonesia. In Osf.Io. https://osf.io/tyfmb/download

Zamaris, Z. (2019). Prevalensi Ektoparasit Pada Ikan Budidaya Di Karamba Jaring Apung Di Teluk Kaping, Buleleng, Bali. JFMR-Journal of Fisheries and Marine Research, 3(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jfmr.2019.003.01.4

Zulham, A. (2016). Kapasitas Jaringan Sosial Dan Kebijakan Revitalisasi Pelabuhan Perikanan Di Pulau Terdepan (Pelajaran dari Revitalisasi Pangkalan Pendaratan Ikan Lugu, di Kabupaten Simeulue). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 11(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.15578/jsekp.v11i2.1633

Downloads

Published

2022-10-22

How to Cite

Ikhsan, I., Husna, C. A., & Pratama, A. (2022). IMPLEMENTATION OF FISHERIES UMKM POLICY IN SIMEULUE REGENCY. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 20(02), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v20i02.7236

Issue

Section

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION