GAP ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENT AGENCY PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM INDICATORS TO ACCOUNTABILITY THEORY
Abstract
There was no concurrent rise in the corruption perception index subsequent to the observed elevation in AKIP scores. This observation suggests that the AKIP framework has not comprehensively assessed all dimensions of the accountability theory. This article examines the disparities that exist between accountability theory and the indicators employed in the AKIP assessment. The methodology employed in this study is a comprehensive review of existing literature. The analysis yielded the discovery that multiple AKIP indicators necessitate enhancement in order to align the measurement more closely with the theory of accountability. The indicators can be classified into two distinct categories, specifically technical indicators and conceptual indicators. Technical indicators encompass a range of metrics that are utilized to assess various aspects of performance. These indicators include outcome achievement indicators, which gauge the extent to which desired outcomes have been realized. Additionally, effectiveness and efficiency indicators are employed to evaluate the degree to which objectives are met in a timely and resource-efficient manner. Periodic reporting indicators are utilized to monitor and report on progress at regular intervals. Lastly, employee professionalism indicators are used to assess the level of professionalism exhibited by individuals within an organization. Conceptual indicators encompass several key dimensions, namely transparency, liability, controllability, responsibility, and responsiveness.
Downloads
References
Alam, T., Aftab, M., Abbas, Z., Ugli, K. M. M., & Bokhari, S. A. A. (2023). Impact of E-Government Initiatives to Combat Corruption Mediating by Behavioral Intention: A Quantitative Analysis from Emerging Economies. Sustainability, 15(3), 2694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032694
Bivins, T. H. (2006). Responsibility and accountability. Ethics in Public Relations: Responsible Advocacy, 19–38.
Bleyen, P., Klimovský, D., Bouckaert, G., & Reichard, C. (2017). Linking budgeting to results? Evidence about performance budgets in European municipalities based on a comparative analytical model. Public Management Review, 19(7), 932–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1243837
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2018). Accountability and transparency to fight against corruption: an international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(5), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393951
Chang, Z., Rusu, V., & Kohler, J. C. (2021). The Global Fund: why anti-corruption, transparency and accountability matter. Globalization and Health, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00753-w
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Cruz Dallagnol, E., Portulhak, H., & Cezar Severo Peixe, B. (2023). How is public value associated with accountability? A systematic literature review. Public Money & Management, 43(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2129531
Dal Mas, F., Massaro, M., Lombardi, R., & Garlatti, A. (2019). From output to outcome measures in the public sector: a structured literature review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(5), 1631–1656. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2018-1523
De Man, A. (2022). Strengthening the fight against corruption through the principle of accountability. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 25(1).
Habibi, F., & Nugroho, A. (2018). Penerapan Dimensi Akuntabilitas publik dalam pencegahan korupsi dana desa di Kabupaten PandegLANg. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v15i2.161
Hidayati, C., & Islamudin, A. (2022). Accountability Training and Assistance based on Digital Accounting Information Systems in Cupak Village, Jombang Regency. Proceeding Global Conference on Social Science, 1(1), 89–100.
Hopwood, A. G., & Tomkins, C. (1984). Issues in public sector accounting. (No Title).
Iyoha, F. O., & Oyerinde, D. (2010). Accounting infrastructure and accountability in the management of public expenditure in developing countries: A focus on Nigeria. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(5), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.06.002
Kloot, L. (1999). Performance measurement and accountability in Victorian local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(7), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559910308039
Kluvers, R. (2003). Accountability for performance in local government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00314
Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x
Lyrio, M. V. L., Lunkes, R. J., & Taliani, E. T. C. (2018). Thirty years of studies on transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector: The state of the art and opportunities for future research. Public Integrity, 20(5), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1416537
Matek, O. (1977). A methodology for teaching human sexuality to social work students. Journal of Education for Social Work, 13(3), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220612.1977.10671456
McGrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2018). Accountability and responsibility defined. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(3), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-0058
Melia, P., & Sari, V. F. (2019). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Publik, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran Dan Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(3), 1068–1079. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v1i3.128
Sabilla, A. A., & Kriswibowo, A. (2021). Implementation Of The Principles Of Good Governance In Combating Stunting In The Jabon District, Sidoarjo Regency. DiA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 19(1), 53–67.
Sanderson, I. (1996). Evaluation, learning and the effectiveness of public services: Towards a quality of public service model. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(5/6), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559610146375
Silva, E., Pinto, K. P., Ferreira, C. M., Belladonna, F. G., De‐Deus, G., Dummer, P. M. H., & Versiani, M. A. (2020). Current status on minimal access cavity preparations: a critical analysis and a proposal for a universal nomenclature. International Endodontic Journal, 53(12), 1618–1635.
Copyright (c) 2024 Alan Sulistyo, Mia Hestiana, Nurul Hasanah, Tusi Sasono (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The DiA journal allows authors to retain the copyright of their papers without limitation. Authors may grant publishers non-exclusive publishing rights to publish articles. Granting first publishing rights to publishers also qualifies as unlimited copyright (because there are no restrictions imposed by publishers on author copyright).
