GAP ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENT AGENCY PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM INDICATORS TO ACCOUNTABILITY THEORY

Authors

  • Alan Sulistyo Universitas Indonesia
  • Mia Hestiana Universitas Indonesia
  • Nurul Hasanah Universitas Indonesia
  • Tusi Sasono Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v22i02.9575

Keywords:

Accountability, AKIP evaluation, Indicator

Abstract

There was no concurrent rise in the corruption perception index subsequent to the observed elevation in AKIP scores. This observation suggests that the AKIP framework has not comprehensively assessed all dimensions of the accountability theory. This article examines the disparities that exist between accountability theory and the indicators employed in the AKIP assessment. The methodology employed in this study is a comprehensive review of existing literature. The analysis yielded the discovery that multiple AKIP indicators necessitate enhancement in order to align the measurement more closely with the theory of accountability. The indicators can be classified into two distinct categories, specifically technical indicators and conceptual indicators. Technical indicators encompass a range of metrics that are utilized to assess various aspects of performance. These indicators include outcome achievement indicators, which gauge the extent to which desired outcomes have been realized. Additionally, effectiveness and efficiency indicators are employed to evaluate the degree to which objectives are met in a timely and resource-efficient manner. Periodic reporting indicators are utilized to monitor and report on progress at regular intervals. Lastly, employee professionalism indicators are used to assess the level of professionalism exhibited by individuals within an organization. Conceptual indicators encompass several key dimensions, namely transparency, liability, controllability, responsibility, and responsiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alan Sulistyo, Universitas Indonesia

Academic at Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia

Mia Hestiana, Universitas Indonesia

Academic at Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia

Nurul Hasanah, Universitas Indonesia

Academic at Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia

Tusi Sasono, Universitas Indonesia

Academic at Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia

References

Daud, Brian Septiadi, and Eko Sopoyono. 2019. ‘PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PERDAGANGAN MANUSIA (HUMAN TRAFFICKING) DI INDONESIA’, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1.3 (Semaranga)

Hajri Atma, Wira, and Heni Susanti. 2020. ‘PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEREMPUAN KORBAN PELECEHAN SEKSUAL’, Kodifikasi, 2.1: 41–60

Jaseh Ardhi, Chiril, Anna Wahongan S., and Harly Muaja S. 2021. ‘HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN MELAPORKAN TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT PASAL 108 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA’, Lex Crimen, 10.11

Kristiyanto, Eko Noer. 2019. ‘Jangkauan Hukum Nasional Terhadap Prostitusi Daring’, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19.1 (Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan HAM): 1 <https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.1-10>

Lee, Samuel, and Petra Persson. 2018. Human Trafficking and Regulating Prostitution *

Muhtadi, Afif Fathin. 2021. ‘Prostitusi Online Sebagai Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang’, Jurist-Diction, 4.6 (Universitas Airlangga): 2125 <https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i6.31838>

Nugroho, Bastianto, and M Roesli. 2017. ‘ANALISA HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG (HUMAN TRAFFICKING)’, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum , 2.1 <https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.7>

Parliansyah Dandy, Muhammad, Boy Arisandy, and Bintang Poetra Maha. 2022. KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR, Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial, Dan Ekonomi

Peraturan Kapolri. 2017. ‘Peraturan Kapolri No.12 Tahun 2017 Tentang Syarat Dan Tata Cara Penetapan Pembagian Hukum Kepolisian NKRI’ (Indonesia)

Prisilla, Josephine Cindy. 2020. ‘KRIMINALISASI PENGGUNA JASA PEREMPUAN YANG DILACURKAN (PEDILA) SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG’, Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3.2

Purwanegara, Dian Sukma. 2020. ‘Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Melalui Media Sosial’, Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 15.2 (Universitas Airlangga): 118 <https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v15i2.2020.118-127>

RIA. 2016. ‘Awas Salah Memahami Prostitusi Sebagai TPPO’, HukumOnline.Com <https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/awas-salah-memahami-prostitusi-sebagai-tppo-lt573b1ab569542> [accessed 10 July 2022]

Siregar Manahan, Khoiruddin. 2019. ‘PARADOKS PENGATURAN HUKUM PROSTITUSI DI INDONESIA’, Jurnal Al-Maqsid, 5.1 (Padangsidimpuan)

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Manajemen, ed. by Sugiyono (Bandung: Alfabeta)

UU Republik Indonesia. 2007. ‘Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Tahun 2007’ (Indonesia)

Wijaya, Jonathan Surya. 2020. ‘Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Para Pihak Perkara Prostitusi Online Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana’, Jurist-Diction, 3.6 (Universitas Airlangga): 2245 <https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i6.22970>

Zulkarnain Sanjaya. 2020. Viktimologi & Kriminologi Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Pengetahuan, ed. by Zulkarnain Sanjaya (Depok: Rajawali Pers)

Lyrio, M. V. L., Lunkes, R. J., & Taliani, E. T. C. (2018). Thirty years of studies on transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector: The state of the art and opportunities for future research. Public Integrity, 20(5), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1416537

Matek, O. (1977). A methodology for teaching human sexuality to social work students. Journal of Education for Social Work, 13(3), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220612.1977.10671456

McGrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2018). Accountability and responsibility defined. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(3), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-0058

Melia, P., & Sari, V. F. (2019). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Publik, Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran Dan Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(3), 1068–1079. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v1i3.128

Sabilla, A. A., & Kriswibowo, A. (2021). Implementation Of The Principles Of Good Governance In Combating Stunting In The Jabon District, Sidoarjo Regency. DiA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 19(1), 53–67.

Sanderson, I. (1996). Evaluation, learning and the effectiveness of public services: Towards a quality of public service model. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(5/6), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559610146375

Silva, E., Pinto, K. P., Ferreira, C. M., Belladonna, F. G., De‐Deus, G., Dummer, P. M. H., & Versiani, M. A. (2020). Current status on minimal access cavity preparations: a critical analysis and a proposal for a universal nomenclature. International Endodontic Journal, 53(12), 1618–1635.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

How to Cite

Sulistyo, A., Hestiana, M., Hasanah, N., & Sasono, T. (2024). GAP ANALYSIS OF GOVERNMENT AGENCY PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM INDICATORS TO ACCOUNTABILITY THEORY. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 22(02), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v22i02.9575

Issue

Section

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION