DISCOURSE COMMUNICATION NETWORK ANALYSIS 3 PERIODE PADA MEDIA SOSIAL TWITTER
Abstract
This research proposes Foucauldian Discourse Analysis (FDA) as an innovative qualitative methodology to investigate the use of social media as a platform of power control through shared opinions. A phenomenon where social media used as a medium for public to express themselves whereas previously was often done physically (offline), is now more likely to be done in digital area through social media. This study found that the main discourse held no more power than the opponent’s discourse in the contestation. In reality, the main discourse weakened and morphed to dampened actions but still could not become a consensus that led to student action on the streets. While the main discourse was powerfully amplified from bottom to center elites, it ultimately resulted in defeat and failed to acquire acceptance or legitimation by society, leading to pseudo-power.
Downloads
References
Aditomo, K. (2021). Mungkinkah Presiden 3 Periode Terjadi? | AIMAN. Kompas.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
Dzulfaroh, A. N. (2022). 7 Tokoh yang Sebut Tunda Pemilu dan Presiden 3 Periode, Siapa Saja? Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2022/04/11/133000665/7-tokoh-yang-sebut-tunda-pemilu-dan-presiden-3-periode-siapa-saja-
Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (2002). Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge.
Gabriel. (2019). Jokowi Akan Jadi Presiden 3 Periode. Deliknewscom.
Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2011). ANALYZING SOCIAL MEDIA NETWORKS WITH NODEXL Insight from a Connected World (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
Himelboim, I., Mccreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12001
Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault’s Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020239
Kwak, J. A., & Cho, S. K. (2018). Analyzing public opinion with social media data during election periods: A selective literature review. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 5(4), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2018.5.4.285
Merdeka. (2019). Politikus Demokrat Kritik Isu Masa Jabatan Presiden 3 Periode. Merdeka.Com. https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/politikus-demokrat-kritik-isu-masa-jabatan-presiden-3-periode.html
Retnosari, P., Mustansyir, R., & Nugroho, H. W. (2019). DEKONSTRUKSI KOMUNIKASI POLITIK DI ERA DIGITAL (Studi Analisis Wacana Kritis Fairclough). DiA Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 17(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v17i2.3060
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 4(1 SE-Full Papers), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009
Copyright (c) 2024 Irwan Dwi Arianto, Rachmah Ida, Kacung Marijan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The DiA journal allows authors to retain the copyright of their papers without limitation. Authors may grant publishers non-exclusive publishing rights to publish articles. Granting first publishing rights to publishers also qualifies as unlimited copyright (because there are no restrictions imposed by publishers on author copyright).
